Sunday, September 23, 2012

Girl makes Facebook party invite public, riot police called

Here's the Facebook page for the cleanup.

(Credit: Screenshot by Chris Matyszczyk/CNET)

Some parties are a riot.

No really, they are. Riot police are called, because there's simply too much fun going on.

Indeed, my heart rocks to an exalted beat at hearing that such a party broke out in the small Dutch town of Haren.

As the BBC reports it, the 16-year-old girl posted an invitation to her birthday party on Facebook and wasn't quite au fait with the privacy controls.

Her little hometown became somewhat tense at the idea of thousands descending upon its leafy parts to party, for 30,000 people ended up receiving the invitation.

The girl canceled the party, but some 4,000 people still turned up in the hope of a little twisting and shouting. They were greeted by 600 riot police, which can't have done too much for Haren's tourism industry.

More Technically Incorrect

Indeed, the visitors had even created T-shirts for the event. They read "Project X Haren," which seems rather like some corporate away-day.

Still, it seems that the civic-minded have now got together to try and clean up the town.

They've created a new Facebook page called Project Clean-X Haren (Clean-X, geddit?), which seems to be asking for volunteers to polish the mess left by the riot police.

Um, I mean, by the rioters.

The girl, meanwhile, appears to have fled the town in terror before the guests arrived. Which seems frightfully rude.

Honestly, the younger generation today. They just have no sense of decorum.

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57518327-71/girl-makes-facebook-party-invite-public-riot-police-called/?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=News-Internet&Media

juan pablo montoya free pancakes at ihop martina navratilova high school shooting daytona 500 national pancake day ohio school shooting

$UTHR: President & COO JEFFS ROGER Sells

United Therapeutics Corporation UTHR

This page has been successfully added into your Bookmark.

Bookmark of this page has been deleted.

This feature is only available for Members, please Sign Up for FREE membership. If you have already signed up, please Log In

What do you think about this page? Please leave us a message.

Key Ratios


Please Subscribe to see portfolio changes after the end of the last quarter.

Gurus Latest Trades UTHR:


Number of guru portfolios checked: 79. The trades of Premium Gurus are not included unless they are in your Personalized List
TickerGuruDate Action
Impactdown Price Range
(Average)*
Current Price Change from Average Comment Current Shares
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2012-06-30 Add0.6%$41.19 - $49.51
($44.12)
$ 57.7931%Add 101.59%332,744
UTHRHOTCHKIS & WILEY 2012-06-30 Buy 0.02%$41.19 - $49.51
($44.12)
$ 57.7931%New holding, 72000 sh.72,000
UTHRRichard Perry 2012-06-30 Sold Out -0.04%$41.19 - $49.51
($44.12)
$ 57.7931%Sold Out0
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2012-03-31 Add0.31%$45.54 - $50.99
($45.17)
$ 57.7928%Add 82.68%165,063
UTHRRichard Perry 2012-03-31 Buy 0.04%$45.54 - $50.99
($45.17)
$ 57.7928%New holding, 15300 sh.15,300
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2011-12-31 Add0.15%$37.21 - $47.54
($41.57)
$ 57.7939%Add 38.75%90,355
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2011-09-30 Add0.29%$37.47 - $57.38
($48.47)
$ 57.7919%Add 274.82%65,122
UTHREdward Owens 2011-09-30 Add0.16%$37.47 - $57.38
($48.47)
$ 57.7919%Add 77.9%1,787,000
UTHRMichael Price 2011-09-30 Sold Out -0.1%$37.47 - $57.38
($48.47)
$ 57.7919%Sold Out0
UTHRGeorge Soros 2011-09-30 Sold Out -0.0776%$37.47 - $57.38
($48.47)
$ 57.7919%Sold Out0
UTHREdward Owens 2011-06-30 Add0.18%$53.49 - $70.7
($63.39)
$ 57.79-9%Add 183.36%1,004,500
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2011-06-30 Buy 0.13%$53.49 - $70.7
($63.39)
$ 57.79-9%New holding, 17374 sh.17,374
UTHRMichael Price 2011-06-30 Reduce-0.59%$53.49 - $70.7
($63.39)
$ 57.79-9%Reduce -82.59%12,500
UTHRGeorge Soros 2011-03-31 Add0.08%$63.22 - $69.54
($66.9)
$ 57.79-14%Add 1213.41%107,700
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2011-03-31 Sold Out $63.22 - $69.54
($66.9)
$ 57.79-14%Sold Out0
UTHRMichael Price 2011-03-31 Reduce-0.24%$63.22 - $69.54
($66.9)
$ 57.79-14%Reduce -24.97%71,800
UTHRJoel Greenblatt 2010-12-31 Buy 0.13%$54.26 - $64.24
($60.02)
$ 57.79-4%New holding, 6216 sh.6,216
UTHRAndreas Halvorsen 2010-12-31 Sold Out -0.24%$54.26 - $64.24
($60.02)
$ 57.79-4%Sold Out0
UTHRGeorge Soros 2010-12-31 Reduce-0.22%$54.26 - $64.24
($60.02)
$ 57.79-4%Reduce -95.62%8,200
UTHRMichael Price 2010-09-30 Add0.3%$46.22 - $56.07
($50.08)
$ 57.7915%Add 38.29%95,700
PremiumReal Time Picks are included for Premium Members only!!
*The price and date might not be the actual time and price at which the transactions were made. In the case of institutional owners, the date is stated as the last day of their fiscal quarter. The prices are estimates if no accurate information available. Foreign holdings may not be included.
"); $('#ajax_box1').load($(this).attr('href'), function(){ }); return false; });

UTHR is held by these Gurus:

UTHR: Insider Buys/Sells (?)

Click Here for All Insider Trades.
InsiderPosition Date Trades Shares Trade Price ($) Change (%) Details
JEFFS ROGERPresident & COO 2012-09-21Sell7,500$57.790view
Ferrari John MaximCFO 2012-09-20Sell5,500$58.05-0.45view
MAHON PAUL AEVP & General Counsel 2012-09-20Sell6,000$58.05-0.45view
JEFFS ROGERPresident & COO 2012-09-07Sell7,500$55.194.71view
MAHON PAUL AEVP & General Counsel 2012-09-06Sell4,501$55.693.77view
Ferrari John MaximCFO 2012-09-06Sell5,500$55.693.77view
CAUSEY CHRISTOPHERDirector 2012-09-06Sell1,500$55.943.31view
PATUSKY CHRISTOPHERDirector 2012-09-05Sell2,000$55.474.18view
JEFFS ROGERPresident & COO 2012-08-17Sell7,500$56.222.79view
Ferrari John MaximCFO 2012-08-16Sell5,500$56.292.66view


Press Releases about UTHR:

Quarterly/Annual Reports about UTHR:

News about UTHR:

Articles on GuruFocus.COM
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: UTHR, PMC, ABR, AIR, SCHS 23 Jun 2012?
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: UTHR, TAT, PMC, BRCD, ENDP 16 Jun 2012?
CEO of Utd Therapeutic Martine Rothblatt Bought 13,649... 14 Jun 2012?
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: CKH, UTHR, DRL, VAC, DENN 23 Dec 2011?
United Therapeutics (UTHR) CEO Martine A. Rothblatt buys... 19 Dec 2011?
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: UTHR, DENN, PNK, CTFO, AVII 18 Dec 2011?
11 Dec 2011?
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: UTHR, SUSS, ONFC, FSC, FBP 11 Dec 2011?
Vanguard Health Care Fund Edward Owens Buys HCA, AFL, CVS,... 01 Nov 2011?
?Hedge Fund King? Steven Cohen Reports Second Quarter... 18 Aug 2011?

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MostRecentInsiderBuys/~3/QDgWaXEFcpY/StockBuy.php

branson missouri davy jones dead monkees last train to clarksville tim tebow taylor swift post grad arpaio

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Economics and Investing: - SurvivalBlog.com

This page contains a single entry by Jim Rawles published on September 22, 2012 2:11 AM.

Odds 'n Sods: was the previous entry in this blog.

The Survival Mindset, by M.C.J. is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Source: http://www.survivalblog.com/2012/09/economics-and-investing-1299.html

whitney houston cause of death marquette university marquette hilary duff michigan state michigan state city creek center

CEIBS Hosts 3rd China Real Estate Forum - Business Review Europe

SHANGHAI, Sept. 22, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --?The impact of frequent policy changes on China's real estate sector, the need for clearly defined property tax structures and a detailed roadmap for the planned construction of more than 30 million homes, as well as exploring securitisation as an option for infusing capital into the country's real estate sector were among the issues discussed during today's 3rd China Real Estate Forum. Hosted by the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) at its Shanghai Campus, the event brought together the political, academic, and business communities to explore how the Chinese real estate industry and individual enterprises can develop healthily and steadily in the long-term. The theme was "The Real Estate Show's Second Act: Who's in Charge?"

After striving to cope for more than a year in an environment of adjustment and tightening, China's real estate industry is facing a test of wisdom and is being challenged to achieve a spectacular turnaround. What role will strategic investments play? How can product positioning and market segments be seized? How can capital risks be managed? These were also among the questions explored today.

After an opening address by CEIBS Executive President Zhu Xiaoming during an opening session moderated by CEIBS Vice President and Dean John Quelch, Prof. Wu Xiaoling delivered the first keynote speech. A Member of the NPC Standing Committee, Vice Chairman of the NPC's Financial and Economic Committee, Former Deputy Governor of People's Bank of China, and Dean of CEIBS Lujiazui Institute of International Finance (CLIIF), Madam Wu spoke on the topic "Striving for System Perfection & Stable Expectations". Making it clear that her comments were being made in her capacity as Dean of CLIIF, she spoke of the need for stable policies in the real estate sector. There have been frequent changes over the last five years, Madam Wu noted, which have contributed to some of the irrational behaviour the industry has seen. She welcomed the government's indication that recently introduced price control mechanisms are temporary and it will gradually allow the market to find its own way. "The Chinese economy is at a crucial point, we will soon have a new administration; it is important that the entire society reach a consensus and talk about the residential property market. We need to find the policy that is right for China," Madam Wu urged. During her comprehensive address, she also touched on issues including: housing supply and the need to regulate distribution, land supply and the impact of local government's heavy reliance on proceeds from land sale, and the need to revisit the existing real estate taxation system. China's property tax, she argued, should be reconfigured as consumption tax in order to curb speculation in the market. These and other issues need to be addressed, she suggested, before the pilot property tax project now in cities such as Shanghai is rolled out to other locations.???

Next, there was an off-the-record keynote speech by Ms. Xie Jiajin. She is the former Chief Economist & Director General of the Department of Housing and Real Estate Industry in the PRC's Ministry of Construction, and an expert at the PRC's Real Estate Market Macro-Control Decision-Making in the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. She also serves as Chairwoman of the China Property Management Institute.

The forum's opening session concluded with a final keynote speech by Professor Daniel Quan from Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration, who spoke on "What Can China Learn from America's Real Estate Industry". Arguing that the US' 2008 financial crisis was not caused by securitisation of real estate assets, he suggested that China could benefit greatly from using this method of accessing capital and reducing risk. Analysis of the crisis had shown, Prof. Quan said, that the sub-prime mortgage market is a very small piece of the US' overall capital market and it could not have been the root cause of the 2008 financial upheaval. "It triggered the financial collapse but the crisis could also have been caused by any other multiple triggers," he argued, after explaining that studies had shown that all major crises occur when there is a mixture of increased public and private debt plus a dramatic increase in housing prices. "I don't want you to leave here thinking securitisation is bad. Securitisation is good, but be careful," he said, stressing that the US economy had benefited from this method of financing for 25 years.

The day's first session then focused on "The Real Estate Show's Second Act: Which Way to Go?" Panellists Mr. Zhu Zhongyi, Vice Chairman of China Real Estate Association; Mr. Andrew O K Chow, Vice Chairman of Wharf (Holdings) Limited as well as Chairman of Wharf China Development Limited; Dr. Wang Li, Associate Principal of McKinsey & Company; and Mr. David Ng, Managing Director & Research Executive of Real Estate Greater China, Macquarie Capital Securities Ltd. discussed how the industry can find longer term solutions to its problems. They also analysed whether unclear real estate positioning and planning will affect the nation's economic development in the next decade. Mr. Yang Hongxu, Vice President of E-house China R&D Institute, moderated.

In his opening remarks, Mr. Zhou Zhongyi also spoke of the need to put in place clearly defined, rational policies crafted with the recognition of the significant role that the property market has within the wider context of China's economic growth. Steps that need to be taken, he said, include:

  • introducing a housing development plan for the coming 5 years,?
  • formulating a detailed plan for the construction of more than 30 million units of affordable housing,
  • reducing the gap between supply and demand,
  • focusing on providing adequate housing for the migrant population,
  • reforming the land use system to prevent irrational price jumps,
  • and companies who wish to be sustainable must be ready for when the government implements these and other changes.

After Mr. Andrew O K Chow's brief look at the advantages and disadvantages of operating in the mainland and Hong Kong real estate markets, there was a presentation by Dr. Wang Li. She spoke about urbanisation in China and its impact on the real estate sector. Citing McKinsey data that there will be a 50% increase in the countryside migration rate over the next few years, she told the audience that this would translate into a lot of opportunities for the real estate market. The question is, are sector developers ready to provide the standardised products needed to meet these needs? "That's the challenge urbanisation has brought to developers," she said. She also spoke of the growing trend of developers pursuing larger projects ? entire cities instead of merely apartments. One of the issues that have come with this trend is trying to determine, when these developments make efforts to be green, who pays for the added cost.

During his opening remarks Mr. David Ng, speaking from the perspective of an investor, looked at the correlation between growth in the real estate sector and increase in personal income. He anticipates that housing prices will slow, thanks to the measures being taken by the government.

All four presenters then participated in a panel discussion in which they fielded questions from the moderator and the audience.

The focus of session two was "How Should the Real Estate Industry Handle the Second Act?", and panellists offered answers to questions such as: will the national strategic plan to continue promoting urbanisation help the industry, or will streamlined market partitioning and large-scale mergers and reorganisations bring new life to the sector? They also examined the experiences of other countries.?

Dr. Ma Hongman, Host & Commentator from China Business News (CBN) moderated, and panellists were: Prof. Nie Meisheng, Chairwoman of China Real Estate Chamber of Commerce; Mr. Fan Wei, Executive Director & Co-President of Fosun Group; CEIBS alumnus Mr. Wong Chun Hong, Chairman of Topspring International Holdings and Founder & Vice President of Rainbow Department Store Co. Ltd.; Mr. Tian Ming, Chairman & President of Landsea Group Holding Ltd.; and Ms. Jane Lok, Senior Director of the Board at CB Richard Ellis.

Nie Meisheng opened the session, speaking briefly about housing prices. There is a need to reduce prices by 50% in order to make housing more reasonable, she said, adding that it will be difficult to quickly adjust prices, and that the overall situation of the Chinese real estate industry is too complex for short-term solutions. Fan Wei gave an overview of the business strategies of his company, Fosun, while Wong Chun Hong described some of the problems facing the industry, focusing his comments on shopping mall development. "We need to rely on the market, not the government, to regulate the industry," he stressed. Shopping mall developers must take the long-term view, Mr. Wong explained, because it could take seven or eight years for them to break even, and a strong portfolio of shops is crucial to success in the long-run. Tian Ming then spoke about his company Landsea, describing its progress since 2001, when it was founded, and Jane Lok spoke about commercial real estate. Ms. Lok outlined the risks inherent in the commercial sector: financial risks, product risks (wrong product positioning), and operational risks (improper sales and lease strategy, improper trade and tenant mix).?

A question and answer session followed, with audience members raising topics such as governmental policies, real estate development in rural areas, and property tax.

In session three, the topic was "Opportunities in Real Estate Asset Management". Panellists looked at the end of unilaterally raising asset prices, and the beginning of cyclical asset fluctuations in the industry. Real estate enterprises have greater need for professional services in the areas of return on assets, liquidity and asset management, and speakers discussed other aspects of the real estate financial market, and how real estate asset management will likely have many opportunities in the future.

CEIBS Professor of Finance and Accounting Oliver Rui moderated the session, and panellists were: Prof. Daniel Quan, Singapore Tourism Board Distinguished Professor in Asian Hospitality Management at Cornell University's School of Hotel Administration; Chiu Kwok Hung, Executive Director of Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited; and CEIBS alumnus Liang Xingan, Vice General Manager of Shenzhen WorldUnion Properties Consultancy Co. Ltd.

In his speech, Chiu Kwok Hung reflected that only three years ago, interest rates were low and it was easy to get financing. Many felt that the market would keep going up, and the domestic market was so young that it had not before experienced substantial fluctuations. "Now, many developers are having problems selling commercial real estate because it is difficult for buyers to get financing. In the coming years, access to more financial products will become more important for the market," he said.

The real estate market is in its second phase, Liang Xingan said during his speech, "but real estate is an old business, and stable long-term returns are key to success." He added that those in the industry must make the most of the situation, and carry on regardless of macroeconomic developments. Full life cycle asset management is a new and innovative idea in China, said Mr. Liang, since real estate transactions had traditionally been thought of as a one-time deal.? He urged the audience to start planning a financing strategy before buying a piece of land.

Prof. Daniel Quan then spoke about the impact of the Federal Reserve's QE3 (quantitative easing) on US and Asian markets. QE3, he explained, is the Federal Reserve Bank's open-ended policy of purchasing mortgage-backed securities. The goal of the policy, said Prof. Quan, is to reduce long-term yield rates on low interest bonds, in order to force investors to purchase higher yield investments. A negative aspect of the policy could be inflation. According to Prof. Quan, implications for China and Hong Kong could include an influx of investment from people seeking higher yields, as well as potential downward pressure on the yuan due to deflation of the dollar.

Taking questions from the audience, the panellists discussed investment choices, property derivatives, the PE market in China, diversification, cycles of price highs and lows, differences in Chinese and US stimulus strategies, and rental prices.

Asked by Prof. Rui to sum up their views, Prof. Quan said that he was "cautiously optimistic," Mr. Wong placed emphasis on "sustainable development," while Mr. Liang reminded the audience that there are "still many opportunities in China's real estate market".

CEIBS President Pedro Nueno ended the forum with a closing address. It is important to be realistic, he said, while also stressing, "there is still much optimism in China, and those in the industry must keep a positive outlook."

?

SOURCE China Europe International Business School

Source: http://www.businessrevieweurope.eu/press_releases/ceibs-hosts-3rd-china-real-estate-forum

record store day 2012 detroit red wings jose canseco zimmerman derek fisher lyrid meteor shower hippocrates

One-size-fits-all school accountability in Texas ? RIP? | Opinion Blog

We?ve heard one thing from a lot of legislative candidates this year ? ease up on mandates from Austin and let local school districts do their jobs. Call it a strong drift, especially from Republicans.

Now comes an announcement from new TEA Commissioner Michael Williams that he?s inviting high-performing districts ? including eight in North Texas ? to help develop the next generation of ?standards, assessments and accountability systems.?

Translation: These districts have earned the right for latitude from the state?s cookie-cutter assessment system.

Many of these same districts are members of a local group named the North Texas Regional Consortium. The group jumped into the fray over centralized education dictates earlier this year, saying that high-stakes standardized testing is ?strangling our public schools.? I?d say politicians are listening to the political muscle from the suburbs. Good.

Do not confuse this with our newspaper?s editorial policy ? which is crazy about testing and wants new edicts from Austin on teacher evaluations. The position is motivated largely by the mess in the dysfunctional Dallas district, and I get our anxiety.

But we should not confuse Dallas? needs with Highland Park?s or Coppell?s needs.

Why should the state impose the same routines on successful campuses and districts as it does for ones in constant distress and failure? That makes no sense, and I feel the approach may be coming to a stop.

One caveat on Williams? list: Not all these districts are what I would call high-performing, but that?s another conversation.

We can?t proclaim the three-decade-long experiment with standardized testing a success. Witness TAB chief Bill Hammond?s thundering sermon today in the Texas Tribune about how crummy Texas schools are. Agreed. The numbers stink, overall. But why argue to stay the course? The state should let truly high-performers use more of their resources building on success, rather than force them to keep concentrating on the low bar set for the laggards.

What concerns me is the way Hammond addresses ?Texas local school bureaucrats.? Which ones? I hope not the superintendents whose districts enjoy high property values because of the quality of their schools.

(Actually, the slap is undoubtedly a reference to the 787 school districts whose boards have passed resolutions expressing concern over high-stakes testing. It?s an odd list, really, since it includes Dallas ISD, which just hired a new sheriff, superintendent Mike Miles, who?s big on using test scores to rate teachers.)

I wasn?t sure I was going to like Commissioner Williams, but I like this move. It challenges convention. It allows for differences. It encourages creativity.

I hope it resists some of faddish thinking that crummy schools could leap and bound ahead if only they?re pressured into buying the latest testing and evaluation products off the shelf. That?s looking for a silver bullet and helping corporate interests cash in on distress. (It also ignores some of the cautionary research about the in-vogue ?value added model? of teacher evaluation.)

DO NOT assume there?s no profit motive in the so-called ?school reform? movement.

Public schools are among the most cherished of Democratic institutions in this nation, and local communities ought to have the strongest say in how to run them.

Source: http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/2012/09/one-size-fits-all-school-accountability-in-texas-rip.html/

one direction tulsa news scalloped potatoes the ten commandments charlton heston moses tulsa shooting

Improve your Well-being with Nopalea | Home Improvement Ideas

Sometimes a bad thing can lead to a good thing, and those who suffer from joint pains caused by inflammation can confirm this. Those who were unwilling to resort to medication despite suffering from intense pain, and considered the alternative of using Nopalea will be the first to appraise the product. What was initially regarded as a solution for coping with pain turned into a way of living, because this product does more than alleviating pain. It was designed to reduce inflammation and help the body fight off toxicity, and it?s active substances are all natural, extracted from a species of cactus.

The best thing about Nopalea is that it has no contraindications and those who use other medications can safely consume it without fearing repercussions. Basically, this is a dietary supplement which is better to be consumed in quantities that vary from 3 to 6 ounces per day for the first month. Maintaining this dose for 30 days is aimed at helping the body remove the toxins, while dealing with the inflammations that are causing pain. Beyond this milestone, customers are advised to reduce the dose and intake between 1 and 3 ounces per day, depending upon their needs.

Nopalea tastes lovely and it is better to be consumed fresh, which is why the best way to keep it is by refrigerating the bottle immediately after acquiring it. Furthermore, in order to ensure freshness and enjoy the best results while indulging in the delicious taste, buyers should consume it within the first month after opening. There is more than meets the eyes to Nopalea because the ingredients contain a powerful antioxidant called bioflavonoid. This substance has been proven by scientists to be essential in helping the body get rid of harmful toxins, and the indirect effect is the reduction of inflammation.

Related posts:

  1. Fight Inflammation with Nopalea
  2. Protect Against Toxicity
  3. Ease the Pain
  4. Garden Soil Types and How to Improve Them
  5. Improve your Health and Wealth

Source: http://www.liberilibri.com/improve-your-well-being-with-nopalea/

aretha franklin stevie wonder new orleans weather new orleans weather sparkle sacagawea new hope baptist church

Friday, September 21, 2012

A High-Poverty School in Watts Gets the Ultimate Makeover

{ttle}

{cptn}","template_name":"ss_thmb_play_ttle","i18n":{"end_of_gallery_header":"End of Gallery","end_of_gallery_next":"View Again"},"metadata":{"pagination":"{firstVisible} - {lastVisible} of {numItems}","ult":{"spaceid":"97476175","sec":""}}},{"id": "hcm-carousel-2065322693", "dataManager": C.dmgr, "mediator": C.mdtr, "group_name":"hcm-carousel-2065322693", "track_item_selected":1,"tracking":{ "spaceid" : "97476175", "events" : { "click" : { "any" : { "yui-carousel-prev" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"prev","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } }, "yui-carousel-next" : { "node" : "a", "data" : {"sec":"HCMOL on article right rail","slk":"next","itc":"1" }, "bubbles" : true, "test": function(params){ var carousel = params.obj.getCarousel(); var pages = carousel._pages; // no more pages, don't beacon again // if same page, don't beacon if(("_ult_current_page" in carousel) && carousel._ult_current_page==pages.cur) return false; // keep track of current position within this closure carousel._ult_current_page = pages.cur; return true; } } } } } } })); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings = '"projectId": "10001256862979", "documentName": "", "documentGroup": "", "ywaColo" : "vscale3", "spaceId" : "97476175" ,"customFields" : { "12" : "classic", "13" : "story" }'; Y.Media.YWA.init(Y.namespace("Media").ywaSettings); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {(function() { try{ if (Math.floor(Math.random()*10) == 1) { var loc = window.location, decoded = decodeURI(loc.pathname), encoded = encodeURI(decoded), uri = loc.protocol + "//" + loc.host + encoded + ((loc.search.length > 0) ? loc.search + '&' : '?') + "_cacheable=1", xmlhttp; if (window.XMLHttpRequest) xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); else xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); xmlhttp.open("GET",uri,true); xmlhttp.send(); } }catch(e){} })(); }); Y.later(10, this, function() {if(document.onclick===YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.newClick){document.onclick=YAHOO.Media.PreventDefaultHandler.oldClick;} }); }); });